Saturday, August 29, 2009

Day 56: Kiensvay and Filter Alteration

Chanveasna and I at the Phase I filters

I spoke with Dr. Davin Uy about my suggestion, whose detail I will reveal upon my return. Simply, the filter has been having two issues. First, it cannot output more than 40 liters of water per day. Any volume more than that results in poor removal of arsenic. The SONO filter, which is similar to many arsenic filters, does better in these situations. Its design differs in that the sand is on the very top and the iron core, which replaces the iron nails, is below that. On the other hand, the Kanshan filter has the placement of sand and iron reversed. Thus, I suggested the following experiment:

First, have 3 conditions, A: pour water into Filter 1 without nails and pour the fluent into filter 2 with iron nails. B: pour water into Filter 3 with nails and pour the fluent into filter 4 with iron nails. C: pour water into filter 5 twice. D. pour water into filter 6 just once.

In this experiment, we will test the hypothesis that having the water run through the filter twice help reduce arsenic much more than just once. In addition, have the water run through two different filters should be no different from running it through the same filter twice. However and most importantly, having no iron nails should give rise to the similar performance as the previous conditions because the sand alone in the first filter should remove all the coating elements, namely PO4-, that prevents the nails from removing arsenic. One thing to keep in mind is that Fe in water helps remove nearly 60% of the arsenic while the nails only works to remove 30% of the arsenic claimed. While the collateral damage is that this initial filtration would also remove Fe2+ and Fe(OH)2, arsenic is already trapped here at the first stage along with Fe. The iron nails should work just well as before. The additional layer of sand provides additional assurance that nearly all of arsenic is removed and that the filter will not need to cleaned as often as previously thought.

Dr. Davin Uy and I
So I went to Dr. Davin Uy. He first thought that due to the initial removal of iron, the filter would lose half of its functionality. It was rather dramatic when I told him what exactly I had in mind. He thought it was a good idea and will not just the pilot and will instead go the whole way by building a filter I suggested with a sand-nail-sand design from scratch! The whole filter will probably cost nearly $100. He said it is no problem and he will keep me updated on these designs. As of now, the Kanshan needs something like this as it would need to be replaced every half year since it will not produce any less than 50 ppb after 6 months. I am so anxious for this and its results!

Thursday, August 20, 2009

Day 54: Kampong Chnnang

Going for a coconut!
Children that benefit from the Biosand filter

Day 53: Kampong Chnnang

The village chief
The promotional meeting
Milking a cow

Day 52: Orphange and Stung Mean Chey

We taught these children at the Lighthouse.
After going to the orphanages, I decided to go visit Stung Mean Chey, a garbage dump knee deep. I climbed through giant mounds of rubbish for tin cans, plastic bags and other recyclable goods. While others say it is one of the saddest sights in Phnom Penh, a sprawling 100-acre garbage dump where trash fires burn and plumes of black smoke choke the air with toxic gases, I found some happy faces once they were offered some candy and clothes.
The waste is soggy. No many locals have ever visited this place.

Day 50: Orphanage

One of my goals was to teach and to enable high school and undergraduate students to pursue their own service project. After exploring several options, including pushing a campaign with the government, purchasing trash for areas where there is trash burning and helping cleaning trash at Riverside, we decided that we would begin by going to orphanages to teach about sanitation and hygiene.

Cambodian Light Children's Association
Students going for answers

Day 48: Around Phnom Penh

Streets near Independent Monument
Viriya and Olaf at the new Hagar office
We talked about the next steps. Viriya is skeptical that the sanitation/hygiene information are not disseminated as some of the villagers claim. He showed some of the flowcharts that are meant to be used at all construction sites, which seemed to contain all the necessary information. I am worried that it may not be used everywhere. He and Dr. Ray Cantwell will question my findings. The first step in verifying these results is to determine whether Jomroeun has accurately translated what was said. Following that, they will go back to the staff and try to find where the gap is.

My suggestion is that there to be multimedia education on how to clean the safe storage container and the filter spout. Currently, the sanitation education is loosely constructed and I would suggest that it becomes standardized and streamlined.

Day 45: Key Takeaway Recommendations for Hagar

When looking at our results, nearly all users are satisfied with the Biosand filter, for it saves time by removing boiling and acquiring firewood as necessary procedures. Interestingly, a large proportion of the users desired more structured hygiene and sanitation teachings from Hagar. The in-depth interview provides an exploratory perspective that should be further tested. Because the pool of interviewee is small, these following recommendations should only be considered following a well-designed survey with a larger sample size.

1. The villagers will benefit from using soap to wash their storage containers at all times. To achieve this, they must receive additional information from Hagar. Currently, families interviewed are concerned about residual soap in their drinking water. A sizable portion of the families do not feel that they have good grasp of cleaning themselves. Hagar should educate these families about the difference soap makes and, how often to clean the storage filters.. In addition, these families can even be introduced to using bleach in cleaning the storage container. While it may be a tall task to change behavior, with visual illustrations, numerical facts, and personal accounts, it is possible to offer these families detailed step-by-step instruction about cleaning the storage in a brochure.

2. Villagers using the Biosand filter will also benefit from using a transparent filter that gives clear indication for algae growth. With an exception to the concern that the container might be more fragile by subject 2, all of families interviewed expressed positive opinion to its adoption.

3. We believe that villagers can benefit from more active participation in the learning program before filter installation. This active participation comes from both villagers and Hagar. Villagers must engage more family members to show up, as they will distribute the work load to their families eventually. On the other hand, Hagar conducts a group activity with its volunteers . Similarly, Hagar may offer such problem-based learning to her users.

4. Villagers will benefit from learning about when and how to clean the spout. Currently, it is unclear to users whether one should use soap for this particular safe practice. While most claim that it is cleaned almost as often as the storage container, it is clear that it is not the case. Thus, we recommend incorporating step-by-step instructions on cleaning the removable spout as well.

5. Villagers will benefit from a more concrete, comprehensive, multimedia instruction of cleaning the storage container and spout. Currently, Hagar’s multimedia education focuses on Hagar’s presence and the advantages the Biosand filter provides. However, all information about cleaning the storage container and spout are provided at the time of installation. Nearly half of the users do not believe that they have a firm grasp on cleaning the filter and the storage container. For example, the fact that the spout is removable remains elusive and this can be clarified so that users can easily clean them.

6. Villagers will lastly benefit from multimedia instructions on hygiene. Currently, the promotional video does not contain such information. Most of the hygiene information is given at the promotional meeting, after the multimedia video by Hagar staff. If safe hygiene practice, such as when to wash their hand, is given by multimedia instead, Hagar can better demonstrate its significance. We suggest 6 and 7 to be done in a second meeting after the filters are installed.

7. It is implausible to not have the task of cleaning the storage container and spout be assigned to another family member different from the one that participated in the promotional meeting. Therefore, we believe that it may be beneficial to assess rather than demonstrate safe cleaning practices and hygiene at follow-up meetings. We recommend researching the applicability of approaches like having Hagar staff observe and correct user practice if necessary and offering information on acquiring soap.

8. Hagar may facilitate its learning program by partnering with organizations that specialize in health education and utilizing volunteers from such sources. It seems from our interviews that World Vision has provided regular hygiene education to selected families. Cooperation with such organization may help result in more effective education material for users.

9. It may be a boon for Hagar to include incentives so that the staff can make sure that users return for an optional second meeting and understand the washing and cleaning the filter completely. A measure could be to charging $1 more upfront and returning that upon successful completion of the program.

10. Lastly, we recommend testing whether an inexpensive water quality intervention can be adopted here. When family subjects use sodium hypochorite in a Zambian study, 69% of water samples had no detectable growth of E. coli. CDC and Pan American Health Organization have developed a simple, inexpensive, and easy-to-disseminate intervention to improve drinking water quality and hygiene in developing countries. These interventions include 1) point of use water disinfection with a sodium hypochlorite solution produced locally using appropriate technology, 2) durable, plastic storage, and 3) community education about diarrhea and proper use of the intervention. While resistance behavioral change is an initial concern, subjects in their field trial showed high compliance (89.2%). A majority interviewees in our study have said they are open to this idea. Less cleaning work and improved education on the above may encourage them to adopt this practice. However, the willingness of the target population to pay for these elements and to change their lifestyle should be assessed further.